Apache Airflow vs Huginn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Airflow
Programmatically author, schedule and monitor workflows
VS
Huginn
Agents that monitor and act on your behalf
| Feature | Apache Airflow | Huginn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 46,409 | ★ 49,759 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory | IFTTT, Zapier |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Airflow or Huginn better?
Huginn is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache Airflow if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache Airflow and Huginn free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Airflow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Huginn under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Airflow and Huginn with Docker?
Apache Airflow: yes. Huginn: yes.