Huginn vs Supercronic
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Huginn
Agents that monitor and act on your behalf
VS
Supercronic
Crontab-compatible job runner built for containers
| Feature | Huginn | Supercronic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 49,759 | ★ 2,596 |
| First released | 2013 | 2017 |
| Replaces | IFTTT, Zapier | cron |
Why pick each one
Choose Supercronic if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Huginn or Supercronic better?
Neither is universally better. Huginn has the larger community, while Supercronic is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Huginn and Supercronic free and open-source?
Yes. Huginn is licensed under MIT and Supercronic under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Huginn and Supercronic with Docker?
Huginn: yes. Supercronic: yes.