Huginn vs Restate
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Huginn
Agents that monitor and act on your behalf
VS
Restate
Durable execution engine for resilient applications
| Feature | Huginn | Restate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | BUSL-1.1 |
| Language | Ruby | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 49,759 | ★ 4,263 |
| First released | 2013 | 2023 |
| Replaces | IFTTT, Zapier | Temporal |
Why pick each one
Choose Restate if…
- Released under the BUSL-1.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Huginn or Restate better?
Neither is universally better. Huginn has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Huginn and Restate free and open-source?
Yes. Huginn is licensed under MIT and Restate under BUSL-1.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Huginn and Restate with Docker?
Huginn: yes. Restate: yes.