Huginn vs MQTTX Web
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Huginn | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | free |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 49,759 | ★ 5,012 |
| First released | 2013 | 2022 |
| Replaces | IFTTT, Zapier | — |
Why pick each one
Choose MQTTX Web if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 5k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Huginn or MQTTX Web better?
Neither is universally better. Huginn has the larger community, while MQTTX Web is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Huginn and MQTTX Web free and open-source?
Yes. Huginn is licensed under MIT and MQTTX Web under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Huginn and MQTTX Web with Docker?
Huginn: yes. MQTTX Web: yes.