Huginn vs Maxun
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Huginn
Agents that monitor and act on your behalf
VS
Maxun
No-code web data extraction and scraping platform
| Feature | Huginn | Maxun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 49,759 | ★ 17,077 |
| First released | 2013 | 2024 |
| Replaces | IFTTT, Zapier | Octoparse, Import.io |
Why pick each one
Choose Maxun if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 17.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Huginn or Maxun better?
Neither is universally better. Huginn has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Huginn and Maxun free and open-source?
Yes. Huginn is licensed under MIT and Maxun under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Huginn and Maxun with Docker?
Huginn: yes. Maxun: yes.