Hubzilla vs Invidious
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Hubzilla | Invidious |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0-only |
| Language | PHP | Crystal |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 380 | ★ 22,442 |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Facebook, Google+ | YouTube |
Why pick each one
Choose Invidious if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
- Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Crystal
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Hubzilla or Invidious better?
Invidious is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Hubzilla if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Hubzilla and Invidious free and open-source?
Yes. Hubzilla is licensed under MIT and Invidious under GPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hubzilla and Invidious with Docker?
Hubzilla: yes. Invidious: check the project docs for container support.