diaspora* vs Hubzilla

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurediaspora*Hubzilla
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageRubyPHP
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 13,649★ 380
First released20102015
ReplacesFacebook, TwitterFacebook, Google+

What are diaspora* and Hubzilla?

diaspora*

diaspora* is a free, open-source, privacy-aware decentralized social network. It is organized into independently operated pods that federate, giving users ownership of their data.

  • Federated pod network
  • Aspects for sharing control
  • Hashtag-based discovery
  • Data ownership focus

Read the full diaspora* guide →

Hubzilla

Hubzilla is a free, open-source platform for creating interconnected websites with decentralized identity, social networking, file storage, and content management features.

  • Nomadic decentralized identity
  • Social networking and CMS
  • Cloud file storage
  • Fine-grained permissions

diaspora* vs Hubzilla: key differences

Diaspora* is written in Ruby, while Hubzilla is built with PHP. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for diaspora* versus MIT for Hubzilla. Hubzilla is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for diaspora*. Diaspora* is the more established project (first released 2010), while Hubzilla arrived in 2015. Diaspora* has the considerably larger community, at 13,649 GitHub stars versus 380.

Why pick each one

Choose diaspora* if…

  • Strong privacy ethos
  • Established network

Watch out for

  • Limited fediverse interoperability
  • Slower development
diaspora* details

Choose Hubzilla if…

  • Unique nomadic identity
  • Very feature-rich

Watch out for

  • Complex to learn
  • Niche community
Hubzilla details

Frequently asked questions

Is diaspora* or Hubzilla better?

Neither is universally better. diaspora* has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are diaspora* and Hubzilla free and open-source?

Yes. diaspora* is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Hubzilla under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run diaspora* and Hubzilla with Docker?

diaspora*: yes. Hubzilla: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, diaspora* or Hubzilla?

Hubzilla has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for diaspora*. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons