Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup vs zrepl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup
Open-source backup solution for files and databases
VS
zrepl
Automated ZFS snapshot replication and pruning
| Feature | Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup | zrepl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 275 | ★ 1,151 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Veeam | Veeam |
Why pick each one
Choose Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose zrepl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup or zrepl better?
Neither is universally better. zrepl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup and zrepl free and open-source?
Yes. Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup is licensed under GPL-3.0 and zrepl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup and zrepl with Docker?
Backblaze alt nono Nxs-backup: yes. zrepl: check the project docs for container support.