Zigbee2MQTT Assistant vs ntfy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureZigbee2MQTT Assistantntfy
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageC#Go
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 448★ 33,263
First released20192021
ReplacesSmartThings HubPushover, Pushbullet

Why pick each one

Choose Zigbee2MQTT Assistant if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C#
Zigbee2MQTT Assistant details

Choose ntfy if…

  • Extremely easy to use
  • Cross-platform apps
ntfy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Zigbee2MQTT Assistant or ntfy better?

Neither is universally better. ntfy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Zigbee2MQTT Assistant and ntfy free and open-source?

Yes. Zigbee2MQTT Assistant is licensed under MIT and ntfy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Zigbee2MQTT Assistant and ntfy with Docker?

Zigbee2MQTT Assistant: yes. ntfy: yes.

Related comparisons