OpenMQTTGateway vs ntfy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenMQTTGatewayntfy
CategoryHome AutomationHome Automation
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,073★ 33,263
First released20162021
ReplacesSmartThings HubPushover, Pushbullet

Why pick each one

Choose OpenMQTTGateway if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
OpenMQTTGateway details

Choose ntfy if…

  • Extremely easy to use
  • Cross-platform apps
ntfy details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenMQTTGateway or ntfy better?

ntfy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenMQTTGateway if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenMQTTGateway and ntfy free and open-source?

Yes. OpenMQTTGateway is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ntfy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenMQTTGateway and ntfy with Docker?

OpenMQTTGateway: check the project docs for container support. ntfy: yes.

Related comparisons