Home Assistant Operating System vs Mozilla WebThings Gateway
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Home Assistant Operating System | Mozilla WebThings Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | ≈5-minute setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 91 · Excellent | 81 · Excellent |
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | one-click, bare-metal | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,492 | ★ 2,646 |
| First released | 2019 | 2018 |
| Replaces | SmartThings, Hubitat | SmartThings, Google Home |
What are Home Assistant Operating System and Mozilla WebThings Gateway?
Home Assistant Operating System
Home Assistant Operating System is a minimal embedded OS designed to run the Home Assistant smart home platform with add-on support. It manages updates and add-ons through the Supervisor.
- Purpose-built OS for HA
- Add-on store via Supervisor
- Automatic updates
- Runs on Pi and x86
Mozilla WebThings Gateway
WebThings Gateway is an open-source gateway for monitoring and controlling smart home devices over the web using open standards. Originating at Mozilla, it now continues as a community project.
- Web of Things standards
- Add-on device support
- Rules engine
- Local web interface
Home Assistant Operating System vs Mozilla WebThings Gateway: key differences
Home Assistant Operating System is written in Python, while Mozilla WebThings Gateway is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Home Assistant Operating System versus MPL-2.0 for Mozilla WebThings Gateway. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Home Assistant Operating System. Home Assistant Operating System has the considerably larger community, at 7,492 GitHub stars versus 2,646. Mozilla WebThings Gateway lists first-class Docker deployment; Home Assistant Operating System does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Home Assistant Operating System if…
- Easiest full-featured HA install
- Managed add-ons
Watch out for
- Takes over the whole device
- Less general-purpose
Choose Mozilla WebThings Gateway if…
- Open standards-based
- Privacy-focused
Watch out for
- Smaller community after Mozilla
- Fewer integrations than HA
Frequently asked questions
Is Home Assistant Operating System or Mozilla WebThings Gateway better?
Home Assistant Operating System is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Mozilla WebThings Gateway if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Home Assistant Operating System and Mozilla WebThings Gateway free and open-source?
Yes. Home Assistant Operating System is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Mozilla WebThings Gateway under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Home Assistant Operating System and Mozilla WebThings Gateway with Docker?
Home Assistant Operating System: check the project docs for container support. Mozilla WebThings Gateway: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Home Assistant Operating System or Mozilla WebThings Gateway?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Home Assistant Operating System. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Home Assistant Operating System vs AppDaemon
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs AppDaemon
- Home Assistant Operating System vs Domoticz
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Domoticz
- Home Assistant Operating System vs ESPHome
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs ESPHome
- Home Assistant Operating System vs evcc
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs evcc
- Home Assistant Operating System vs FHEM
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs FHEM