Hollo vs Ktistec

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHolloKtistec
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score79 · Good79 · Good
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptCrystal
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 489★ 436
First released20242020
ReplacesTwitter, MastodonTwitter, Mastodon

What are Hollo and Ktistec?

Hollo

Hollo is a federated single-user microblogging server compatible with the Mastodon client API. It is designed for individuals who want their own ActivityPub presence without running a multi-user instance.

  • Single-user microblog
  • Mastodon API compatible
  • ActivityPub federation
  • Markdown posts

Ktistec

Ktistec is a single-user ActivityPub server written in Crystal, designed to be easy to deploy and maintain. It provides a personal fediverse presence with a simple, self-contained runtime.

  • Single-user design
  • Self-contained runtime
  • SQLite storage
  • ActivityPub federation

Hollo vs Ktistec: key differences

Hollo is written in TypeScript, while Ktistec is built with Crystal. Ktistec is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Hollo. Ktistec is the more established project (first released 2020), while Hollo arrived in 2024. Hollo lists first-class Docker deployment; Ktistec does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Hollo if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Hollo details

Choose Ktistec if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Crystal
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Ktistec details

Frequently asked questions

Is Hollo or Ktistec better?

Neither is universally better. Hollo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Hollo and Ktistec free and open-source?

Yes. Hollo is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Ktistec under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Hollo and Ktistec with Docker?

Hollo: yes. Ktistec: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Hollo or Ktistec?

Ktistec has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Hollo. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons