SHSelfHostIndex

hitobito vs Meeting scheduler nono Booked

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
HI hitobito Manage complex group hierarchies with members, events and a lot more VS ME Meeting scheduler nono Booked Resource scheduling and reservation system
FeaturehitobitoMeeting scheduler nono Booked
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRubyPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 475★ 779
First released20262011
Replaces—Skedda, Acuity Scheduling

Why pick each one

Choose hitobito if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Ruby
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
hitobito details

Choose Meeting scheduler nono Booked if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Meeting scheduler nono Booked details

Frequently asked questions

Is hitobito or Meeting scheduler nono Booked better?

Neither is universally better. Meeting scheduler nono Booked has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are hitobito and Meeting scheduler nono Booked free and open-source?

Yes. hitobito is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Meeting scheduler nono Booked under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run hitobito and Meeting scheduler nono Booked with Docker?

hitobito: check the project docs for container support. Meeting scheduler nono Booked: yes.

Related comparisons