hitobito vs Scheduling poll nono Nuages

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturehitobitoScheduling poll nono Nuages
CategoryCalendar & ContactsCalendar & Contacts
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageRubyTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 475★ 509
First released20262020
ReplacesWhen2meet, Doodle

Why pick each one

Choose hitobito if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Ruby
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
hitobito details

Choose Scheduling poll nono Nuages if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Scheduling poll nono Nuages details

Frequently asked questions

Is hitobito or Scheduling poll nono Nuages better?

Scheduling poll nono Nuages is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider hitobito if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are hitobito and Scheduling poll nono Nuages free and open-source?

Yes. hitobito is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Scheduling poll nono Nuages under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run hitobito and Scheduling poll nono Nuages with Docker?

hitobito: check the project docs for container support. Scheduling poll nono Nuages: yes.

Related comparisons