HitKeep vs Umami
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HitKeep
Privacy-first web analytics with goals, funnels, ecommerce tracking,
VS
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
| Feature | HitKeep | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 80 | ★ 38,103 |
| First released | 2026 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Choose HitKeep if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is HitKeep or Umami better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider HitKeep if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are HitKeep and Umami free and open-source?
Yes. HitKeep is licensed under MIT and Umami under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HitKeep and Umami with Docker?
HitKeep: yes. Umami: yes.