HashBackup vs Minarca Backup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
HashBackup
Efficient command-line backup with deduplication
VS
Minarca Backup
Centralized rdiff-backup with self-service restore
| Feature | HashBackup | Minarca Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1 | ★ 239 |
| First released | 2009 | 2016 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan | CrashPlan, Veeam |
Why pick each one
Choose HashBackup if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Minarca Backup if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is HashBackup or Minarca Backup better?
Neither is universally better. Minarca Backup has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are HashBackup and Minarca Backup free and open-source?
Yes. HashBackup is licensed under MIT and Minarca Backup under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run HashBackup and Minarca Backup with Docker?
HashBackup: check the project docs for container support. Minarca Backup: yes.