Harp vs Publican
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Harp
Static web server with built-in preprocessing
VS
Publican
Lightweight JavaScript static site and blog generator
| Feature | Harp | Publican |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,995 | ★ 20 |
| First released | 2013 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Jekyll | Jekyll, Hugo |
Why pick each one
Choose Harp if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (5k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Publican if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Harp or Publican better?
Neither is universally better. Harp has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Harp and Publican free and open-source?
Yes. Harp is licensed under MIT and Publican under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Harp and Publican with Docker?
Harp: check the project docs for container support. Publican: check the project docs for container support.