Harbor vs zot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHarborzot
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 29,113★ 2,579
First released20162019
ReplacesDocker Hub, ArtifactoryDocker Hub, Harbor

Why pick each one

Choose Harbor if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
Harbor details

Choose zot if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
zot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Harbor or zot better?

Neither is universally better. Harbor has the larger community, while zot is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Harbor and zot free and open-source?

Yes. Harbor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and zot under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Harbor and zot with Docker?

Harbor: yes. zot: yes.

Related comparisons