Apache Guacamole Lite vs MeshCentral
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Guacamole Lite
Clientless remote desktop gateway library
VS
MeshCentral
Full remote management and remote desktop web platform
| Feature | Apache Guacamole Lite | MeshCentral |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 331 | ★ 7,023 |
| First released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaces | TeamViewer, Citrix | TeamViewer, ConnectWise |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache Guacamole Lite if…
- Lightweight alternative
- Easy to integrate
Choose MeshCentral if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
- Written in HTML
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Guacamole Lite or MeshCentral better?
Neither is universally better. MeshCentral has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Apache Guacamole Lite and MeshCentral free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Guacamole Lite is licensed under MIT and MeshCentral under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Guacamole Lite and MeshCentral with Docker?
Apache Guacamole Lite: yes. MeshCentral: yes.