mailcow vs WildDuck

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemailcowWildDuck
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0EUPL-1.2
LanguageJavaScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM6,144 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 13,245★ 2,107
First released20162017
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Google WorkspaceMicrosoft Exchange, Gmail

Why pick each one

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Choose WildDuck if…

  • API-driven management
  • Horizontally scalable
WildDuck details

Frequently asked questions

Is mailcow or WildDuck better?

mailcow is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider WildDuck if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are mailcow and WildDuck free and open-source?

Yes. mailcow is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WildDuck under EUPL-1.2. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mailcow and WildDuck with Docker?

mailcow: yes. WildDuck: yes.

Related comparisons