mailcow vs swaks

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuremailcowswaks
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptPerl
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM6,144 MB16 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,245★ 1,327
First released20162003
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Google WorkspaceMailtrap

Why pick each one

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Choose swaks if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Perl
swaks details

Frequently asked questions

Is mailcow or swaks better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community, while swaks is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are mailcow and swaks free and open-source?

Yes. mailcow is licensed under GPL-3.0 and swaks under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mailcow and swaks with Docker?

mailcow: yes. swaks: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons