aerc vs mailcow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureaercmailcow
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB6,144 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 3,300★ 13,245
First released20192016
ReplacesGmail, OutlookMicrosoft Exchange, Google Workspace

Why pick each one

Choose aerc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
aerc details

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Frequently asked questions

Is aerc or mailcow better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are aerc and mailcow free and open-source?

Yes. aerc is licensed under MIT and mailcow under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run aerc and mailcow with Docker?

aerc: check the project docs for container support. mailcow: yes.

Related comparisons