mailcow vs mpop

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuremailcowmpop
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptC
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM6,144 MB16 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,245★ 19
First released20162005
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Google Workspacefetchmail

Why pick each one

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Choose mpop if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 16 MB RAM
mpop details

Frequently asked questions

Is mailcow or mpop better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community, while mpop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are mailcow and mpop free and open-source?

Yes. mailcow is licensed under GPL-3.0 and mpop under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mailcow and mpop with Docker?

mailcow: yes. mpop: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons