mailcow vs MailHog

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemailcowMailHog
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM6,144 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,245★ 16,107
First released20162014
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Google WorkspaceMailtrap

Why pick each one

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Choose MailHog if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.1k GitHub stars
MailHog details

Frequently asked questions

Is mailcow or MailHog better?

MailHog is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider mailcow if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are mailcow and MailHog free and open-source?

Yes. mailcow is licensed under GPL-3.0 and MailHog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mailcow and MailHog with Docker?

mailcow: yes. MailHog: yes.

Related comparisons