mailcow vs Larch

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemailcowLarch
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM6,144 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 13,245★ 616
First released20162009
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange, Google WorkspaceHosted migration services

Why pick each one

Choose mailcow if…

  • All components preconfigured
  • Active community
mailcow details

Choose Larch if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in Ruby
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Larch details

Frequently asked questions

Is mailcow or Larch better?

Neither is universally better. mailcow has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are mailcow and Larch free and open-source?

Yes. mailcow is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Larch under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mailcow and Larch with Docker?

mailcow: yes. Larch: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons