SHSelfHostIndex

Easy!Appointments vs Kopano Groupware Core

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
EA Easy!Appointments Open-source web appointment scheduler VS KO Kopano Groupware Core Open-source collaboration platform with Outlook support
FeatureEasy!AppointmentsKopano Groupware Core
CategoryGroupwareGroupware
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPC++
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,306★ 60
First released20132016
ReplacesCalendly, Acuity SchedulingMicrosoft Exchange

Why pick each one

Choose Easy!Appointments if…

  • Lightweight and easy
  • Good for small businesses
Easy!Appointments details

Choose Kopano Groupware Core if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C++
Kopano Groupware Core details

Frequently asked questions

Is Easy!Appointments or Kopano Groupware Core better?

Easy!Appointments is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kopano Groupware Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Easy!Appointments and Kopano Groupware Core free and open-source?

Yes. Easy!Appointments is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kopano Groupware Core under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Easy!Appointments and Kopano Groupware Core with Docker?

Easy!Appointments: yes. Kopano Groupware Core: yes.

Related comparisons