Colanode vs Kopano Groupware Core

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureColanodeKopano Groupware Core
CategoryGroupwareGroupware
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,006★ 60
First released20262016
ReplacesMicrosoft Exchange

Why pick each one

Choose Colanode if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 5k GitHub stars
Colanode details

Choose Kopano Groupware Core if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C++
Kopano Groupware Core details

Frequently asked questions

Is Colanode or Kopano Groupware Core better?

Colanode is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Kopano Groupware Core if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Colanode and Kopano Groupware Core free and open-source?

Yes. Colanode is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kopano Groupware Core under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Colanode and Kopano Groupware Core with Docker?

Colanode: yes. Kopano Groupware Core: yes.

Related comparisons