Graylog vs Grafana Loki

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGraylogGrafana Loki
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseSSPL-1.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 8,105★ 28,687
First released20102018
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsSplunk, Datadog Logs

Why pick each one

Choose Graylog if…

  • Powerful search and pipelines
  • Polished web UI
Graylog details

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Frequently asked questions

Is Graylog or Grafana Loki better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Graylog and Grafana Loki free and open-source?

Yes. Graylog is licensed under SSPL-1.0 and Grafana Loki under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Graylog and Grafana Loki with Docker?

Graylog: yes. Grafana Loki: yes.

Related comparisons