Gravitee API Management vs NPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gravitee API Management
Open-source API management platform
VS
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
| Feature | Gravitee API Management | NPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 438 | ★ 34,157 |
| First released | 2015 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Apigee, MuleSoft | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose Gravitee API Management if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Java
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Gravitee API Management or NPS better?
NPS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Gravitee API Management if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gravitee API Management and NPS free and open-source?
Yes. Gravitee API Management is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gravitee API Management and NPS with Docker?
Gravitee API Management: yes. NPS: yes.