Grav vs Wiki-Go
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Grav | Wiki-Go |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,620 | ★ 608 |
| First released | 2014 | 2025 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Squarespace | GitBook, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose Wiki-Go if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Grav or Wiki-Go better?
Grav is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Wiki-Go if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Grav and Wiki-Go free and open-source?
Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Wiki-Go under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Grav and Wiki-Go with Docker?
Grav: yes. Wiki-Go: check the project docs for container support.