SHSelfHostIndex

Grav vs Razuna

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
GR Grav Fast flat-file CMS with no database required VS RA Razuna Digital asset management and content hub
FeatureGravRazuna
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePHPColdFusion
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,620★ 178
First released20142008
ReplacesWordPress, SquarespaceBynder

Why pick each one

Choose Grav if…

  • Trivial to back up and migrate
  • Quick to set up
Grav details

Choose Razuna if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in ColdFusion
Razuna details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grav or Razuna better?

Grav is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Razuna if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grav and Razuna free and open-source?

Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Razuna under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grav and Razuna with Docker?

Grav: yes. Razuna: yes.

Related comparisons