Grav vs Payload CMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGravPayload CMS
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 15,620★ 44,043
First released20142021
ReplacesWordPress, SquarespaceContentful, Sanity

Why pick each one

Choose Grav if…

  • Trivial to back up and migrate
  • Quick to set up
Grav details

Choose Payload CMS if…

  • Excellent TypeScript developer experience
  • No vendor lock-in
Payload CMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grav or Payload CMS better?

Neither is universally better. Payload CMS has the larger community, while Grav is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grav and Payload CMS free and open-source?

Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Payload CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grav and Payload CMS with Docker?

Grav: yes. Payload CMS: yes.

Related comparisons