SHSelfHostIndex

Grav vs Omeka

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
GR Grav Fast flat-file CMS with no database required VS OM Omeka Create complex narratives and share rich collections, adhering to
FeatureGravOmeka
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 15,620★ 548
First released20142025
ReplacesWordPress, Squarespace—

Why pick each one

Choose Grav if…

  • Trivial to back up and migrate
  • Quick to set up
Grav details

Choose Omeka if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Omeka details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grav or Omeka better?

Grav is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Omeka if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grav and Omeka free and open-source?

Yes. Grav is licensed under MIT and Omeka under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grav and Omeka with Docker?

Grav: yes. Omeka: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons