GraphRAG vs RAGApp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GraphRAG
Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation system
VS
RAGApp
No-code agentic RAG deployment in a Docker container
| Feature | GraphRAG | RAGApp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | AI Chat UIs |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,323 | ★ 4,441 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | OpenAI Assistants | OpenAI Assistants |
Why pick each one
Choose GraphRAG if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 35.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is GraphRAG or RAGApp better?
Neither is universally better. GraphRAG has the larger community, while RAGApp is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GraphRAG and RAGApp free and open-source?
Yes. GraphRAG is licensed under MIT and RAGApp under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GraphRAG and RAGApp with Docker?
GraphRAG: check the project docs for container support. RAGApp: yes.