Grafana vs NUT Exporter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafanaNUT Exporter
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 76,153★ 333
First released20142019
ReplacesDatadogAPC PowerChute

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Choose NUT Exporter if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
NUT Exporter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or NUT Exporter better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana and NUT Exporter free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NUT Exporter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana and NUT Exporter with Docker?

Grafana: yes. NUT Exporter: yes.

Related comparisons