Gotenberg vs Carbone Document Engine
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gotenberg
API for converting documents to PDF
VS
Carbone Document Engine
Template-based report and document generator
| Feature | Gotenberg | Carbone Document Engine |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Office Suites |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,808 | ★ 2,087 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Adobe PDF Services | DocRaptor, Adobe PDF Services |
Why pick each one
Choose Carbone Document Engine if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Gotenberg or Carbone Document Engine better?
Gotenberg is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Carbone Document Engine if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gotenberg and Carbone Document Engine free and open-source?
Yes. Gotenberg is licensed under MIT and Carbone Document Engine under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gotenberg and Carbone Document Engine with Docker?
Gotenberg: yes. Carbone Document Engine: yes.