Ambar vs Gotenberg
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Ambar | Gotenberg |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,944 | ★ 12,808 |
| First released | 2017 | 2019 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, M-Files | Adobe PDF Services |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ambar or Gotenberg better?
Gotenberg is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ambar if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ambar and Gotenberg free and open-source?
Yes. Ambar is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gotenberg under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ambar and Gotenberg with Docker?
Ambar: yes. Gotenberg: yes.