GoSuki vs Postmarks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoSuki
Privacy-first bookmark manager unifying all browsers
VS
Postmarks
Single-user bookmarking site that federates
| Feature | GoSuki | Postmarks |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 536 | ★ 545 |
| First released | 2024 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Raindrop.io, Pinboard | Pinboard, del.icio.us |
Why pick each one
Choose GoSuki if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Postmarks if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is GoSuki or Postmarks better?
Neither is universally better. Postmarks has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GoSuki and Postmarks free and open-source?
Yes. GoSuki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Postmarks under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoSuki and Postmarks with Docker?
GoSuki: check the project docs for container support. Postmarks: yes.