Password Gorilla vs Infisical

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePassword GorillaInfisical
CategoryPassword ManagersPassword Managers
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageTclTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 425★ 28,613
First released20052022
ReplacesLastPass, Password SafeAWS Secrets Manager, Doppler, HashiCorp Vault

Why pick each one

Choose Password Gorilla if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Tcl
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Password Gorilla details

Choose Infisical if…

  • Excellent developer UX
  • Broad integration catalog
Infisical details

Frequently asked questions

Is Password Gorilla or Infisical better?

Neither is universally better. Infisical has the larger community, while Password Gorilla is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Password Gorilla and Infisical free and open-source?

Yes. Password Gorilla is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Infisical under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Password Gorilla and Infisical with Docker?

Password Gorilla: check the project docs for container support. Infisical: yes.

Related comparisons