Gollum vs ZenTao
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gollum
A simple, Git-powered wiki with a sweet API
VS
ZenTao
Open-source project and team collaboration platform
| Feature | Gollum | ZenTao |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Groupware |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,308 | ★ 1,665 |
| First released | 2010 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Confluence, Notion | Jira, Confluence |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Gollum or ZenTao better?
Neither is universally better. Gollum has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Gollum and ZenTao free and open-source?
Yes. Gollum is licensed under MIT and ZenTao under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gollum and ZenTao with Docker?
Gollum: yes. ZenTao: yes.