Gollum vs Notable
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gollum
A simple, Git-powered wiki with a sweet API
VS
Notable
Markdown-based note-taking app for plain files
| Feature | Gollum | Notable |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker, source | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,308 | ★ 23,496 |
| First released | 2010 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Confluence, Notion | Evernote, Notion |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Gollum or Notable better?
Notable is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Gollum if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gollum and Notable free and open-source?
Yes. Gollum is licensed under MIT and Notable under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gollum and Notable with Docker?
Gollum: yes. Notable: check the project docs for container support.