Gokapi vs XBackBone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGokapiXBackBone
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score84 · Excellent83 · Excellent
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,881★ 1,169
First released20212023
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendWeTransfer

What are Gokapi and XBackBone?

Gokapi

Gokapi is a minimalist file sharing server inspired by Firefox Send. It lets you upload files and generate download links that can expire after a set time or number of downloads.

  • Expiring download links
  • End-to-end encryption option
  • AWS S3 storage support

XBackBone

Lightweight file manager with full ShareX support.

Gokapi vs XBackBone: key differences

Gokapi is written in Go, while XBackBone is built with PHP. XBackBone is the lighter option, starting around 50 MB of RAM against 64 MB for Gokapi. Gokapi is the more established project (first released 2021), while XBackBone arrived in 2023. Gokapi has the considerably larger community, at 2,881 GitHub stars versus 1,169. Gokapi lists first-class Docker deployment; XBackBone does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Gokapi if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
Gokapi details

Choose XBackBone if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
XBackBone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Gokapi or XBackBone better?

Neither is universally better. Gokapi has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Gokapi and XBackBone free and open-source?

Yes. Gokapi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and XBackBone under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Gokapi and XBackBone with Docker?

Gokapi: yes. XBackBone: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Gokapi or XBackBone?

XBackBone has the smaller minimum footprint at 50 MB of RAM, compared to about 64 MB for Gokapi. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons