gocryptfs vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturegocryptfsSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,549★ 87,439
First released20162014
ReplacesBoxcryptorDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose gocryptfs if…

  • Efficient incremental sync
  • Well documented
gocryptfs details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is gocryptfs or Syncthing better?

Syncthing is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider gocryptfs if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are gocryptfs and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. gocryptfs is licensed under MIT and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gocryptfs and Syncthing with Docker?

gocryptfs: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons