gocryptfs vs Cryptomator Hub
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gocryptfs
Fast encrypted overlay filesystem for cloud-synced folders
VS
Cryptomator Hub
Encryption layer and key management for cloud storage
| Feature | gocryptfs | Cryptomator Hub |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,549 | ★ 78 |
| First released | 2016 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Boxcryptor | Boxcryptor |
Why pick each one
Choose Cryptomator Hub if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is gocryptfs or Cryptomator Hub better?
Neither is universally better. gocryptfs has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are gocryptfs and Cryptomator Hub free and open-source?
Yes. gocryptfs is licensed under MIT and Cryptomator Hub under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gocryptfs and Cryptomator Hub with Docker?
gocryptfs: check the project docs for container support. Cryptomator Hub: yes.