Counter.dev Selfhost vs Netron
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Counter.dev Selfhost
Minimalist privacy-respecting web analytics
VS
Netron
Visualizer for neural network and machine learning models
| Feature | Counter.dev Selfhost | Netron |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,007 | ★ 33,323 |
| First released | 2020 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Counter.dev Selfhost if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
Choose Netron if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 33.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Counter.dev Selfhost or Netron better?
Neither is universally better. Netron has the larger community, while Counter.dev Selfhost is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Counter.dev Selfhost and Netron free and open-source?
Yes. Counter.dev Selfhost is licensed under MIT and Netron under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Counter.dev Selfhost and Netron with Docker?
Counter.dev Selfhost: yes. Netron: check the project docs for container support.