Fathom Lite vs Netron
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fathom Lite
Simple, open-source website analytics
VS
Netron
Visualizer for neural network and machine learning models
| Feature | Fathom Lite | Netron |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,013 | ★ 33,323 |
| First released | 2018 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Netron if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 33.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Fathom Lite or Netron better?
Neither is universally better. Netron has the larger community, while Fathom Lite is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Fathom Lite and Netron free and open-source?
Yes. Fathom Lite is licensed under MIT and Netron under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fathom Lite and Netron with Docker?
Fathom Lite: yes. Netron: check the project docs for container support.