GoAccess vs Vector
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
VS
Vector
High-performance observability data pipeline
| Feature | GoAccess | Vector |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | C | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,762 | ★ 22,315 |
| First released | 2010 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Logstash, Fluentd |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GoAccess or Vector better?
Neither is universally better. Vector has the larger community, while GoAccess is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GoAccess and Vector free and open-source?
Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and Vector under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoAccess and Vector with Docker?
GoAccess: yes. Vector: yes.