GoAccess vs PostHog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
VS
PostHog
Open-source product analytics platform
| Feature | GoAccess | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,762 | ★ 37,548 |
| First released | 2010 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GoAccess or PostHog better?
Neither is universally better. PostHog has the larger community, while GoAccess is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GoAccess and PostHog free and open-source?
Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and PostHog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoAccess and PostHog with Docker?
GoAccess: yes. PostHog: yes.