GoAccess vs Plausible
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GoAccess
Real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
VS
Plausible
Lightweight, privacy-friendly website analytics
| Feature | GoAccess | Plausible |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Elixir |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 20,762 | ★ 28,416 |
| First released | 2010 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GoAccess or Plausible better?
Neither is universally better. Plausible has the larger community, while GoAccess is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GoAccess and Plausible free and open-source?
Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and Plausible under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GoAccess and Plausible with Docker?
GoAccess: yes. Plausible: yes.