go-mc vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurego-mcNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 983★ 13,121
First released20182017
Replacescommercial game bot frameworksPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose go-mc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
go-mc details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is go-mc or Nakama better?

Nakama is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider go-mc if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are go-mc and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. go-mc is licensed under MIT and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run go-mc and Nakama with Docker?

go-mc: check the project docs for container support. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons